KIWI FOR GMAIL RESOURCE HOG HOW TO
KIWI FOR GMAIL RESOURCE HOG FULL
KIWI FOR GMAIL RESOURCE HOG SOFTWARE
KIWI FOR GMAIL RESOURCE HOG CODE

I don't need a car that goes 200MPH but that doesn't mean every F1 car is entirely useless, just that it's designed for a different purpose. If Atom is useless for you, don't use it! But don't act like it's garbage for everyone. Having notifications in the browser window that a test that was running in the background failed and being able to click a button and open right to the test file + source file that failed along with annotations about coverage data in the sidebar saves me quite a lot of time and effort. But having that in the browser is a boon to my productivity. I still test and work in multiple browsers to ensure compatibility, but being able to get the rough parts laid out in the editor itself and fix/develop on things that are the same in all browsers is a great productivity boon (especially when i'm working on my laptop with limited screen real estate).Īnd again, I could run everything in a separate console window, logging to files, etc.

KIWI FOR GMAIL RESOURCE HOG CODE

You can use multiple browsers to preview, I prefer to have it in the editor which makes it easier to switch between (same argument for code tabs vs windows). You don't need to like Atom, but to claim it's a 'bad editor' for everyone is silly. I just need a fast editor with lots of functionality and great speed.

So instead of learning some good tools, you just prefer sticking hardly to one regardless the pain.

KIWI FOR GMAIL RESOURCE HOG HOW TO

I think most of the comments to mine would be: just use the editor normally, no one is opening 20 files at the same time, just learn how to code, and have one small file opened. Should I be just a brainless monkey, and be happy that it's fine? Well, my machine has lots of ram, but I need it to some other things as well.įor me Atom is just useless, I don't even get half of the functionality I get from Idea and it uses twice as memory just for beginning. The total memory used by Atom was over 900MB. About 30, all quite short, about 50-100kB each. I have opened a couple javascript files in Atom. For database I have another specialized editor - much better than any IDE.

KIWI FOR GMAIL RESOURCE HOG FULL

For the whole environment I just consoles with full logging, and running different parts. My page must look good in multiple browsers, not in my editor. I just should not complain that some program is useless and terribly resource hungry? What will be next? 'Stop complaining that the browser uses 10GB of ram to show a page, as it is bigger than standard page'? This is just ridiculous.įor showing the html I just use multiple browsers. Stop complaining that the hammer is better than the screwdriver because it can hammer in nails better. That still doesn't mean it's bad software, just that it's not a good fit when compared to the alternatives for me. Vim won't show me 4 panes with ES2016 in one, the compiled version in scrolling-lockstep with the ES2016 pane in the next, and a visual preview of the page as it currently is in the 3rd, and the documentation to a function i'm working on in the 4th.

KIWI FOR GMAIL RESOURCE HOG SOFTWARE

If all you are going to do is open a 6MB file with none of that, then stop using it, and stop acting like it's bad software because it doesn't cater to your needs. Yes, I know, 6MB isn't 'big', but for an editor which is designed to only work on source files which are AT MOST a MB, it's big.

Not to mention that a 6MB file is pretty fucking big for something like atom. That 1GB allows for things like easy theming, inline image viewing, styling/theming via CSS, plugins/extensions written in a web language (which many of it's target demographic use), complete freedom for plugins to do almost anything and everything, a full web browser for easily rendering markdown/websites-in-progress/documentation/etc, code linting, compiling, debugging, decompiling, etc. But it is one of the more capable editors out there. Yes, Atom isn't the most resource friendly editor out there, and nobody is claiming it is. It's like complaining that opening a 6MB file in windows took over 3GB on my system! (ignoring that most of that is the OS getting ready to do other things, and enabling the OS to do things other than opening and reading a 6MB file). These kinds of comparisons always seemed a bit silly to me.

Kiwi for gmail resource hog